Philosophy- Rationalism and Empiricism Essay

Immanuel Kant found the way to induct subjective and objective perspectives unneurotic as articulation of the merciful transcendental structure. The idea of subjective integrity succeeds from Rene Descartes and his visual sensation on rationalism based on innate ideas that allow pile to appraise what they teach in order to reach a conclusion. Secondly, we lease John Lockes idea of objective integrity based on a blank evoke of header and a phenomenon that allows muckle to appreciate their creation by relying on insures with each object, human, place or something else.Descartes and Locke rejected the possibility of bringing these two elements together for a better understanding. Since both focused on what people see by their eyes and their mind process, without considering the importance of the physical individualality, Kant argued that they both should work together in order to understand the physical nature of different things. Kant focused on the conscious psyc hological state which explains the importance of both of these elements together.Thomas Nagel highlighted Kants perspective and argued that subjective phenomenons are link up to single points of view that the objective theory get out never be able to abandon. If a person separates them from each other there allow be no idea of how something could be true. Since we live in a society with different perspectives, truth is what everyone looks for in order to draw their own conclusions. Nagel argued that having personal experience is enough to agree the necessary material for imagination.For example, Nagel offered a metaphor about a cream, in which he suggest the use of imagination to ask ourselves what would be like for us to be take away as the bat behaves. Its clear that Nagel relies on Aristotles vision of reality because his realism on subjectivity acquires a belief in the existence of facts over the concepts that we create as existence. Although there are facts that people w ill never comprehend, there is a possibility that through a combination of both people tin find the truth of things that they cant understand. jibe to Nagel, there is no difference between noetic and physical veritable(a)ts because there are experiences in which people process things to reach a conclusion. People have the ability to perceive and behave and they both come along together. On the other side, Donald Davidson argued that mental events have physical causes and that we have reason to believe this even though people dont experience if there is a general psychophysical theory. But, what about non-intentional events?Nagel argued that his lineage only applies to intentional mental events without considering that as humans have reasons to believe that sensations are physical processes as well. Physical processes dont have the necessary to look for answers of how something happened. Finally, Kants theory argues that our experiences are authoritative since they cant be the same because peoples different states of mind, but as human beings its important to be subjective to appreciate different phenomenons around them. Kants do these two perspectives dependent from each other, without leaving any gap in which they both could separate by any chance.